
Courroies modulaires en plastique à surface plane
Use this family as a selection direction, then confirm the actual pitch, face, width and conveyor interface.
Food-processing conveyors can handle raw pieces, ingredients, trays, wrapped product or secondary packages. Those duties should not be collapsed into a single “food belt” choice. Product footprint, process moisture, cleaning routine, transfer geometry and required documentation all change the useful configuration.


Map the line section by section. A receiving or trimming conveyor may need stable product support; a wash or dewatering stage can benefit from through-belt opening; inspection may need a flatter, visually open work surface; packaging transfers usually reward predictable support and guidance. One production line can therefore use several belt faces without any inconsistency in the overall design.
For Food Processing Modular Belts, the conveyor should be described as a specific process position rather than only by a belt name. That gives a new-design or replacement RFQ enough context to distinguish support, opening, path and drive needs.
| Input | What to describe |
|---|---|
| Product form | Loose pieces, whole product, tray, carton or wrapped pack |
| Process zone | Raw handling, washing, cooling, inspection, packing or case transfer |
| Wet/dry duty | Water volume, carryover and cleaning frequency |
| Transfer geometry | Smallest gap, nose/roller size and product footprint |
| Line duty | Speed, load, accumulation and start/stop pattern |
| Documentation | State any material or food-contact document required for the ordered configuration |
Common problems include small pieces tipping into an opening, water carrying product or debris beyond the intended zone, soft product marking on an aggressive face, transfers that are too large for the product, and replacement belts that fit the frame but do not engage the existing sprockets correctly.
For Food Processing Modular Belts, solve product support, process opening, conveyor path and drive compatibility first. Material and project documentation can then be confirmed for the selected configuration.

Start with product support. If the smallest product needs continuous support, a flat surface is a strong first comparison. Where water, air or crumbs must pass through, compare open-grid options by actual opening pattern rather than by percentage alone. If the route includes a horizontal curve, move the decision into a radius family and supply the curve geometry before discussing material or colour.
Fine pitch can help when the process uses compact transfers or smaller product footprints, but pitch does not define the entire interface. Hinge geometry, underside engagement and sprocket family still have to match.
Open area is useful when the process genuinely needs drainage or airflow. The comparison range includes straight-running examples from 14% up to 38% and radius examples up to 55%; the right value depends on how the product bridges the openings and what the process must release through the belt.
For curved food lines, provide belt width, inside radius, curve angle, guide arrangement and drive location. A nominal 25 mm or 25.4 mm radius family is only the beginning of that review.
| Curve input | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Belt width | Radius capability is related to the selected family and width |
| Inside radius | Defines the turn requirement |
| Curve angle | Sets total path through the guide system |
| Guide profile | Controls location and wear through the curve |
| Drive position | Changes how the belt enters/leaves the curve |
| Empreinte du produit | Checks stability and support through the turn |

Use this family as a selection direction, then confirm the actual pitch, face, width and conveyor interface.

Use this family as a selection direction, then confirm the actual pitch, face, width and conveyor interface.

Use this family as a selection direction, then confirm the actual pitch, face, width and conveyor interface.



On a food processing modular belts conveyor, sprockets, pins, support strips and guide profiles belong in the review whenever they affect the process or refurbishment scope. Pitch is only one drive input; underside geometry and tooth engagement still have to match. Measure wear-strip and guide sections wherever they locate the belt or product.
Inspect hinge/pin condition, sprocket engagement, guide wear and any accumulation of product or debris at return points. Maintenance intervals should be set from the real duty and cleaning programme rather than copied from an unrelated conveyor.
For a new food processing modular belts installation, verify belt direction or orientation where applicable, sprocket position and engagement, guide clearance, return support and transfer alignment. For replacement work in this duty, compare the old wear pattern with the surrounding conveyor before assuming the belt itself caused the problem.
| Area | Send |
|---|---|
| Application | Process step and conveyed product |
| Géométrie de la courroie | Pitch if known, width, face/open area and overall length/centre distance |
| Conveyor path | Straight/curve, inside radius and transfer points |
| Conduire | Sprocket photos/drawing, tooth count, shaft/bore and spacing |
| Devoir | Load, speed, wet/dry condition, cleaning and relevant environment |
| Commercial | Quantity, destination, project stage and requested documentation |
Sometimes, but it is often better to specify each conveyor section around its own process duty. Washing, inspection and packing can favour different faces.
No. State the exact material or regulatory documentation your project requires so it can be confirmed for the ordered configuration.
Top and underside photographs, pitch, belt width, pin/hinge detail, sprocket engagement and a short description of the process zone.
Send the information already available for the food processing modular belts section. A drawing is useful, but a clear photo set plus a few measured dimensions can also start the configuration review.